Bookmarklets for Google Maps Directions

FacebookTwitterTumblrPinterestGoogle+StumbleUponRedditDiggShare

I just made a set of bookmarklets to give me Google Maps directions to the text I’ve selected in my browser. I thought I’d share them in case they’re useful to anyone else!

If you want to use a bookmarklet, click and drag any of the below links into your browser’s bookmarks bar. If that doesn’t work, you can try one of the other options here.

Bookmarklet #1: Driving Directions

Code:

javascript:window.open('https://maps.google.ca/maps?saddr=Your+Address+Here&daddr='+encodeURIComponent(document.getSelection()));

Bookmarklet #2: Transit Directions

Code:

javascript:window.open('https://maps.google.ca/maps?saddr=Your+Address+Here&daddr='+encodeURIComponent(document.getSelection())+'&dirflg=r&ttype=now&noexp=0&noal=0&sort=def&start=0');

Bookmarklet #3: Walking Directions

Code:

javascript:window.open('https://maps.google.ca/maps?saddr=Your+Address+Here&daddr='+encodeURIComponent(document.getSelection())+'&dirflg=w');

Bookmarklet #4: Biking Directions

Code:

javascript:window.open('https://maps.google.ca/maps?saddr=Your+Address+Here&daddr='+encodeURIComponent(document.getSelection())+'&dirflg=b&lci=bike');

These bookmarklets open the map in a new window, but if you’d like the map to open in the same window, you can edit the bookmarklet by replacing javascript:window.open( with javascript:location.href= and removing the closing parenthesis ) at the end. For example:

javascript:window.open('https://maps.google.ca/maps?saddr=Your+Address+Here&daddr='+encodeURIComponent(document.getSelection())+'&dirflg=b&lci=bike');

would become

javascript:location.href='https://maps.google.ca/maps?saddr=Your+Address+Here&daddr='+encodeURIComponent(document.getSelection())+'&dirflg=b&lci=bike';

Hope these come in handy!

FacebookTwitterTumblrPinterestGoogle+StumbleUponRedditDiggShare

Bletchley Park: The Undiscovered Country Estate (where we used computers to beat the Gerries)

FacebookTwitterTumblrPinterestGoogle+StumbleUponRedditDiggShare

Wrens operating the Colossus computer, 1943
Image from the BBC

I watched a documentary a few days ago called “Code-Breakers: Bletchley Park’s Lost Heroes,” about Tommy Flowers and Bill Tutte of Bletchley Park. Any time I watch a documentary about scientists or engineers who went unrecognized during their time, they are invariably women; Rosalind Franklin comes to mind, or Ada Lovelace. And so I kept expecting a woman to appear in the doc, but none materialized. I was disappointed, but it took me a few days to figure out why.

Continue Reading »

FacebookTwitterTumblrPinterestGoogle+StumbleUponRedditDiggShare

Kids Today! (wherein I gripe about old people griping about young people)

FacebookTwitterTumblrPinterestGoogle+StumbleUponRedditDiggShare

I dread elections for several reasons, but the main sore point for me is that I end up having to watch old people slander me for a month and a half. Every election, pundits joyously proclaim that my generation isn’t interested in politics, and they cite all sorts of wonderful studies and crow about their superiority and then they don’t do anything about it. They don’t even seem to care what’s driving the disparity in voter turnout; obviously, the only reason that we turn out is lower numbers is because we’re lazy, and there’s no need to probe any deeper than that into the issue.

I’m a young person, and I’ve voted in every single federal, provincial and municipal election I could since I hit legal age. I’m not a rarity, either, so I think the old fogeys at the CBC and at CTV need to stop being such dicks about the decrease in youth voter turnout. They’ll take advantage of any opportunity to complain about how our generation is lazy* or that the internet is killing society (because young people use it, obvs). That’s not productive at all. Instead, let’s accept this information (lower voter turnout among younger people) without blaming young people and without making ridiculous and baseless assumptions about Kids These Days.

I’m making a list of possible reasons why youth in Canada don’t turn out in the numbers that other age groups do. If we can pinpoint the reason, that will help us solve the problem. Here is what I have so far:

  • Getting to the polls is more difficult if you don’t have a car or a bike. Urban sprawl may be hitting a point where polling stations are further away than people are willing to walk. I’m fortunate in that I live about a 5-minute walk from mine, so it’s not a big deal that I don’t own a car, but that’s probably not the case for everyone. If older voters have cars and younger voters don’t, younger voters far from polling stations may be more likely to stay home.
  • Youth aren’t the heads of households, so canvassers may be ignoring them entirely when going door to door.
  • Young people are more likely to own cell phones than a home phone. Cell numbers may not be listed as frequently in the phone book, meaning that canvassing by phone may not reach them either.
  • Youth may not receive political flyers (the sort that list a candidate’s campaign platform) because they’ve moved out of their parents’ house and haven’t forwarded their mail.
  • If you’re living in a different area from where you’re registered, you may not get your form in the mail.
  • Youth may be better at blocking out advertising, meaning that political advertising and spam mailers may be less effective at making them aware of election dates and protocols, as well as party platforms.
  • Aside from having a Facebook page and sending out a few tweets around budget time, not enough effort is made to communicate with voters over the Internet.
  • Alienation due to negative coverage.
  • Politics is discussed in boring terms, natch. I will battle anyone who claims that my generation is lazier than the baby boomers, but I will acknowledge that I have the attention span of a mustard seed.
  • Lack of policies targeting youth. If none of the parties plan to do anything about youth issues, it makes no difference to the youth vote which one is elected.
  • Our generation is much more diverse than the last generation, but our politicians don’t reflect that diversity. This leads to further alienation and further apathy.
  • Baby boomers had parents who were willing to give their lives for their country; we had parents who were willing to smoke a lot of weed and read beat poetry. This might have an effect on our level of engagement and our appreciation for democracy.
  • Baby boomers grew up during the cold war, which could have lead to an Us-vs-Them mentality that increased political engagement. Politics seems like it was a lot more fun back then, with prime ministers pirouetting around all over the place and PM wives partying with the Stones. The most interesting thing about Stephen Harper is the possibility that he might be a robot.
  • The youth vote is likely more urban, with younger people moving into the cities at the beginning of their careers and then moving out when they want to start a family. If this is the case, their votes might actually be worth less than the votes of older people, because these urban ridings have higher population numbers.
  • We’ve seen a pile of elections in only the last few years, so voting may feel pointless.
  • If you’re young and you don’t earn enough money yet to pay taxes, you may not end up on the list of electors.

I welcome any other suggestions of explanations. Let’s fix this!

* You see, the generation before us broke the economy, but it’s not their fault that we can’t find jobs and have to move back in with our parents, it’s our fault because we’re lazy. That’s how it works. We can’t find jobs because of laziness.

FacebookTwitterTumblrPinterestGoogle+StumbleUponRedditDiggShare

Howlin’ Tucker Plays the Blues

FacebookTwitterTumblrPinterestGoogle+StumbleUponRedditDiggShare

This is fascinating. A scientist should study this.

FacebookTwitterTumblrPinterestGoogle+StumbleUponRedditDiggShare

TRON.

FacebookTwitterTumblrPinterestGoogle+StumbleUponRedditDiggShare

So today I want to talk about TRON: Legacy, but I am finding it difficult to find the words to explain why I love it so much. So I made a list instead, and I hope that at least one thing on the list will make you want to watch it and enjoy it as much as I did.

  1. Daft Punk made the music. There is no way to overstate just how much this makes the entire movie. Daft Punk are GENIOUSES at the top of their craft, and they could not have written a more perfect soundtrack.
  2. It draws heavily from Blade Runner and the Fifth Element, two of my favourite films.
  3. Rather than rejecting the camp, it embraces it. Even the cheesiest dialogue is done with a wink.
  4. The visuals are stunning, and I love the way they restyled the interceptor ships.
  5. It certainly helps that the ’80s are big right now, because this movie is super ’80s and it works really well.
  6. Jeff Bridges has an uncanny ability to jump back and forth from The Sage to The Dude.
  7. Some people may disagree with me, but I thought the story was actually not half bad. You got to know the characters, feel for them, there was a goal they had to accomplish and you wanted them to accomplish it. Yes, it may have been a little predictable. It may have been a little Hollywood. Most Hollywood movies are Hollywood, and that’s not a bad thing. Not every movie has to have a complex plot to be enjoyable. If you’re the type of person who wants every movie to be Eraserhead, then watch Eraserhead.

There are some down sides to the movie, but I wouldn’t necessarily call them down-sides as much as I would call them “things I ignored because the other parts of the movie enveloped them with their awesomeness.”

MILD SPOILER ALERT

Continue Reading »

FacebookTwitterTumblrPinterestGoogle+StumbleUponRedditDiggShare

It starts with a Dalek and goes from there

FacebookTwitterTumblrPinterestGoogle+StumbleUponRedditDiggShare

This is the greatest thing that has ever happened, in the history of the world, anywhere, ever.

Also, that’s an extremely deep V that he’s wearing.

FacebookTwitterTumblrPinterestGoogle+StumbleUponRedditDiggShare

Things I Used to Know

FacebookTwitterTumblrPinterestGoogle+StumbleUponRedditDiggShare

I was going over old files on a computer I’m reformatting, and I found an astrophysics assignment I wrote in third year:

“An HR Diagram was successfully obtained for both the M34 cluster and part of the NGC188 cluster. The main sequence and red giant branch of M34 is clearly visible, whereas the data for NGC188 appears to encompass only the topmost fraction of the full diagram. M34 and NGC188 appeared to have a main sequence turnoff of approximately 0.0 and 0.7, respectively. From this it was possible to determine that NGC188 is significantly older than M34. Possible outliers in NGC188 were identified by comparing the observed data to a generic HR diagram, and by measuring the rough magnitude shifts between the main sequences of each cluster and an absolute magnitude diagram, the distance moduli were determined. M34 was measured to have a distance modulus of 8.6, and therefore a distance of 5.25×102pc from earth. NGC188 had a distance modulus of 11.4 and a distance of 1.905×103pc. The clusters were found to be roughly 1380 parsecs apart.”

Someone asked me a few weeks ago how to figure out distances like this and I couldn’t remember at all anymore. I wasn’t sure if I had ever even learned it. Apparently I did, I just didn’t learn it very well. But hey, it’s cool that I knew it once! And now I (sort of) know it again.

Here was my photo of NGC188 (in colour!):

NGC188 in colour

My photo of M34:

M34 in colour

FacebookTwitterTumblrPinterestGoogle+StumbleUponRedditDiggShare